report:abs

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
report:abs [2026/06/14 12:57] – [Abstract] team5report:abs [2026/06/14 14:30] (current) – [Abstract] team5
Line 7: Line 7:
 The hardware stack is built around ESP32-C3 microcontrollers and MCP2551 CAN transceivers, selected for their low power consumption and high electromagnetic interference immunity in the metro environment. The web platform is implemented in Next.js with a Supabase backend and an automated content moderation pipeline. A functional two-node prototype was delivered within a 100 € budget constraint. The hardware stack is built around ESP32-C3 microcontrollers and MCP2551 CAN transceivers, selected for their low power consumption and high electromagnetic interference immunity in the metro environment. The web platform is implemented in Next.js with a Supabase backend and an automated content moderation pipeline. A functional two-node prototype was delivered within a 100 € budget constraint.
  
-Validation confirmed a CAN bus packet delivery ratio exceeding 99.9 %, end-to-end sensor-to-LED latency below 100 ms, and a System Usability Scale score of 86.59, placing the web interface in the Excellent category. All functional, performance, safety, and user acceptance tests passed successfully.+Validation confirmed a CAN bus packet delivery ratio exceeding 99.9 %, end-to-end sensor-to-LED latency below 100 ms, and a System Usability Scale score of 86.59, placing the web interface in the Excellent category. The prototype passed all software and user-acceptance tests and most functional and performance tests. Two tests failed at the prototype stage: LED signal integrity (a logic-level mismatch) and fire-safety certification (constrained by the €100 budget): both identified as priorities for future revisions.
  • report/abs.1781438274.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2026/06/14 12:57
  • by team5